Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 24.8 to 12.0.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Llama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index28.532.2
Released2024-04-18—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3116

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12061210
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11951208
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
DTBench54.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.91—
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12181208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1149—
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11421160
LMArena Chinese11141192
LMArena Russian11591187
LMArena French1231—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—
LMArena Spanish1241—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11941186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11741194

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12211218
LMArena Creative Writing12101199
LMArena Multi-Turn12231221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.3 vs 34.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper