Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Mistral Small 3.1

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Small 3.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Small 3.1 leads 41.2 to 33.6.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
Llama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index28.831.7
Released2024-04-182025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—102K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$0.56
Results tracked3128

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Coding12061309
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Mistral Small 3.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Hard Prompts11951278
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93127.48
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
DTBench54.2%—
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%3.9%
LMArena Math12181262
Omni-MATH—24.8%
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
GPQA Diamond40.6%41.9%
LMArena Expert11491257
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%
MMLU79.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English11421255
LMArena Chinese11141253
LMArena French12321273
LMArena German11691266
LMArena Japanese10171208
LMArena Korean10171206
LMArena Russian11591263
LMArena Spanish12411283

Instruction Following Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following11941264
IFEval—75%

Long Context Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query11741299

Writing & Preference Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text12211277
LMArena Creative Writing12101253
LMArena Multi-Turn12231270
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper