Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Ministral 3B

Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.5 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

25.6

Rank #336 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 1 category and Ministral 3B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Ministral 3B leads 24.5 to 12.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 40.6% for Llama 3-70B and 25.3% for Ministral 3B.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Ministral 3B specifications
Llama 3-70BMinistral 3B
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index28.525.6
Released2024-04-182024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.04
Output $ / M tokens—$0.04
Results tracked316

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMinistral 3B
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
LMArena Coding1206—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132), Ministral 3B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMinistral 3B
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284), Ministral 3B: 17.7 (#278)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMinistral 3B
DTBench54.2%51.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index122.91118.08
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1195—
LMCA—5.5%
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Ministral 3B leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299), Ministral 3B: 24.5 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMinistral 3B
MATH Level 522.6%14.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
LMArena Math1218—

Knowledge Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#297)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMinistral 3B
GPQA Diamond40.6%25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.3%
LMArena Expert1149—
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMinistral 3B
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1114—
LMArena French1231—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—
LMArena Russian1159—
LMArena Spanish1241—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMinistral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1194—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMinistral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1174—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMinistral 3B
LMArena Text1221—
LMArena Creative Writing1210—
LMArena Multi-Turn1223—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Ministral 3B?

Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.5 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Ministral 3B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper