Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Longcat Flash Chat

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 12.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 35.1% for Llama 3-70B and 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
Llama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderMetaMeituan
Noometry Index28.842.1
Released2024-04-18—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding12061471
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%43.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts11951440
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%
DTBench54.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93—
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math12181442
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert11491454
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English11421404
LMArena Chinese11141465
LMArena French12321456
LMArena German11691408
LMArena Japanese10171373
LMArena Korean10171371
LMArena Russian11591395
LMArena Spanish12411445

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following11941411

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query11741425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text12211427
LMArena Creative Writing12101388
LMArena Multi-Turn12231418

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Longcat Flash Chat share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper