Model comparison
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 37.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.49 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 37.9 (#186), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1296 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 26.2 (#135), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1311 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| DTBench | — | 73.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.93 |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 41.1 (#211), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1253 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1277 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1269 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 68.3 (#189), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1293 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 39.5 (#176), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1299 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 50.8 (#179), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1315 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.9 vs 37.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.