Model comparison
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads 71.1 to 53.5.
Side by side
| Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.32 | — |
| Results tracked | 43 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1035 |
| SciCode | 26% | — |
| WeirdML | 14.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 31.9% | — |
| BALROG | 23% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1018 |
| SimpleBench | 19.9% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.8% | — |
| DTBench | 59.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.5% | — |
| LMCA | 17.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.33 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.6 | — |
| LiveBench | 50.2% | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1267 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 5.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 42.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 41.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1225 | — |
| MMLU | 86.3% | — |
Multilingual Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1217 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1281 | — |
| LMArena German | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1252 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1270 | — |
Instruction Following Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1242 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 82.7% | — |
Long Context Wizardlm 13b leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1256 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1280 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 39.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.6 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.0 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.