Model comparison

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Meta

30.3

Rank #283 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 34.9 to 14.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 14.4% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and 41.2% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.32 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Llama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.337.7
Released2024-12-062025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output4K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.32$7.50
Results tracked4325

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#284), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
WeirdML14.4%41.2%
LMArena Coding12681413
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
SciCode26%—
GSO—4.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct46.9%—
LiveBench Coding36.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.5%—
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.6 (#100), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard31.9%—
BALROG23%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 13.7 (#325), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12571372
SimpleBench19.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning50.8%—
DTBench59.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis49.5%—
LMCA17.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.32—
ForecastBench58.6—
LiveBench50.2%—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.3 (#292), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math12681364
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20255.1%—
LiveBench Math42.2%—
MATH Level 541.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.5 (#220), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert12251337
GPQA Diamond47.4%—
Confabulations22.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.1%—
MMLU86.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 40.1 (#215), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English12361345
LMArena Chinese12171356
LMArena French12801394
LMArena German12511324
LMArena Japanese11491309
LMArena Korean11421307
LMArena Russian12521367
LMArena Spanish12691360

Instruction Following Too close to call

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.3 (#152), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12421356
LiveBench Instruction Following82.7%—

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#290), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12561379
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.8 (#203), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text12741356
LMArena Creative Writing12501333
LMArena Multi-Turn12791365
LiveBench Language39.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.32 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.2 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper