Model comparison
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 31.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 26% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and 42.7% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview.
- Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.32 | — |
| Results tracked | 43 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 26% | 42.7% |
| WeirdML | 14.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 36.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 31.9% | — |
| BALROG | 23% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 19.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | — |
| DTBench | 59.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.5% | — |
| LMCA | 17.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.33 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.6 | — |
| LiveBench | 50.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 5.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 42.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1267 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 41.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1225 | — |
| MMLU | 86.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1217 | — |
| LMArena French | 1281 | — |
| LMArena German | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1252 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1270 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 82.7% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1242 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1256 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1280 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 39.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.