Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Yi-1.5-34B
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and Yi-1.5-34B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Yi-1.5-34B leads 27.5 to 11.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1160 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Yi-1.5-34B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | 25.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1182 |
Knowledge Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 32% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1121 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1139 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Yi-1.5-34B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.