Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 25.0 to 21.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 41% for Llama 3.2 90B and 46.3% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1235 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1220 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | 42.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1242 |
Knowledge Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 46.3% |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1246 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1233 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.