Model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 5 Preview leads 46.1 to 11.1.
  • Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 90B and Step 5 Preview specifications
Llama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
ProviderMetaStepFun
Noometry Index27.547.9
Released2024-09-242026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
LMArena Coding—1480

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
BALROG27.3%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
CritPt—20.9%
EnigmaEval0.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465
Epoch Capabilities Index125.5—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.6%—
ProofBench—42%
LMArena Math—1470
MATH Level 539.4%—

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond41%—
LMArena Expert—1470
MMLU80.3%—

Multimodal Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision10001267
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English—1432
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1444

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
LMArena Multi-Turn—1447

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Step 5 Preview share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper