Model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 31.7 to 10.4.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 90B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Llama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index27.135.3
Released2024-09-242024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked917

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding—1209

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
BALROG27.3%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
EnigmaEval0.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1202
Epoch Capabilities Index125.5—

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.6%—
LMArena Math—1216
MATH Level 539.4%—

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
GPQA Diamond41%—
LMArena Expert—1171
MMLU80.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Vision1000—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1206
LMArena Chinese—1214
LMArena French—1196
LMArena German—1192
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Russian—1219
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1203

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1225

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text—1225
LMArena Creative Writing—1203
LMArena Multi-Turn—1214

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper