Model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 11.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B and 99.2% for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 90B and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Llama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index27.554.8
Released2024-09-242026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked937

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%
LMArena Coding—1514

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
BALROG27.3%—
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index125.5156.75
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
EnigmaEval0.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1503
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.6%99.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1494
MATH Level 539.4%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond41%—
LMArena Expert—1516
MMLU80.3%—

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision10001309
GeoBench52%—
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English—1481
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Russian—1490
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query—1488

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text—1490
LMArena Creative Writing—1455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper