Model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B vs Mistral Small 3

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Small 3 in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Small 3 leads 16.3 to 11.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 41% for Llama 3.2 90B and 47.3% for Mistral Small 3.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 90B and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Llama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index27.531.2
Released2024-09-242025-01-30
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked924

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
LMArena Coding—1246
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Mistral Small 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
BALROG27.3%—

Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
Epoch Capabilities Index125.5127.07
Chess Puzzles—0%
EnigmaEval0.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1233

Math Mistral Small 3 leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.6%6.7%
LMArena Math—1240
MATH Level 539.4%—

Knowledge Mistral Small 3 leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
GPQA Diamond41%47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%
LMArena Expert—1202
MMLU80.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Mistral Small 3: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Vision1000—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English—1198
LMArena Chinese—1204
LMArena French—1203
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1216

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following—1214

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query—1246

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Small 3
LMArena Text—1234
LMArena Creative Writing—1195
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707
LMArena Multi-Turn—1217

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Small 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Mistral Small 3 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper