Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Mistral Nemo
Llama 3.2 90B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Mistral AISummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Nemo in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Nemo leads 25.5 to 11.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B and 10.8% for Mistral Nemo.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | 17.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 118.68 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Mistral Nemo leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | 10.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | 29.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Mistral Nemo?
Llama 3.2 90B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Mistral Nemo share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.