Model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B vs Mistral Large

Mistral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Large in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Large leads 30.1 to 21.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B and 50.3% for Mistral Large.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 90B and Mistral Large specifications
Llama 3.2 90BMistral Large
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index27.531.9
Released2024-09-242024-02-26
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked951

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
SciCode—36.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—30%
LiveBench Coding—47.1%
LMArena Coding—1277
BigCodeBench Complete—38.3%
ALE-Bench—264.7
HumanEval+—62.2%
MBPP+—59.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3.2 90B leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—38.4%
BALROG27.3%—

Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
Epoch Capabilities Index125.5128.52
SimpleBench—22.5%
CritPt—0%
EnigmaEval0.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning—43.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1257
DTBench—65.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—50.1%
LMCA—16.7%
ForecastBench—57.1
LiveBench—48.4%

Math Mistral Large leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.6%8.5%
MATH Level 539.4%50.3%
Omni-MATH—28.1%
LiveBench Math—42.5%
LMArena Math—1262
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Mistral Large leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
GPQA Diamond41%51.3%
MMLU80.3%80%
MMLU-Pro—59.9%
Confabulations—21.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.5%
GPQA (HELM)—43.5%
LMArena Expert—1232

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Mistral Large: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
LMArena Vision1000—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
LMArena Non-English—1237
LMArena Chinese—1240
LMArena French—1325
LMArena German—1254
LMArena Japanese—1188
LMArena Korean—1202
LMArena Russian—1257
LMArena Spanish—1268

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
LiveBench Instruction Following—67.9%
IFEval—87.7%
LMArena Instruction Following—1249

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
LMArena Longer Query—1261

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BMistral Large
LMArena Text—1266
LMArena Creative Writing—1243
Short-Story Creative Writing—69%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—985
WildBench—80.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1260
LiveBench Language—39.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Mistral Large?

Mistral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Mistral Large share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper