Model comparison
Llama 3.2 3B vs Yi-Large
Llama 3.2 3B has enough public results to be ranked (#318); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-Large in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.1 to 27.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 28.3% for Llama 3.2 3B and 47.2% for Yi-Large.
- Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 28.4 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-Large leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314), Yi-Large: 36.1 (#201)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | 37.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | 47.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1126 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena German | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1101 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Yi-Large?
Llama 3.2 3B has enough public results to be ranked (#318); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Llama 3.2 3B or Yi-Large better for coding?
Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Yi-Large share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.