Model comparison

Llama 3.2 3B vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 3B Meta

28.4

Rank #318 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.5

Rank #261 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-4B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen3-4B leads 27.3 to 19.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 21.9% for Llama 3.2 3B and 35.7% for Qwen3-4B.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 3B and Qwen3-4B specifications
Llama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.431.5
Released2024-09-242025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.33—
Results tracked186

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
BigCodeBench Instruct23.4%—
LMArena Coding1098—
BigCodeBench Complete28.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-4B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135), Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard21.9%35.7%
BALROG10.1%—

Reasoning Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1095—

Math Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%
LMArena Math1126—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond—52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1090—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1019—
LMArena Chinese1017—
LMArena German1056—
LMArena Russian949—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1089—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1101—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1110—
LMArena Creative Writing1094—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing595—
LMArena Multi-Turn1105—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Qwen3-4B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper