Model comparison

Llama 3.2 3B vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 3B Meta

28.9

Rank #321 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Llama 3.2 3B leads 56.0 to 47.7.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 3B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Llama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index28.927.9
Released2024-09-242024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.33—
Results tracked1835

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 27.6 (#319), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding10981093
BigCodeBench Instruct23.4%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
BigCodeBench Complete28.3%—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#143), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard21.9%—
BALROG10.1%—

Reasoning Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 21.0 (#228), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10951072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 32.4 (#214), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math11261111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 29.7 (#235), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert10901045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Too close to call

Llama 3.2 3B: 26.2 (#281), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10191021
LMArena Chinese10171021
LMArena German10561044
LMArena Russian9491022
LMArena French—1076
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 56.0 (#275), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10891053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#261), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11001044

Writing & Preference Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 24.7 (#307), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text11101073
LMArena Creative Writing10941037
LMArena Multi-Turn11051018
EQ-Bench Creative Writing595—
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Llama 3.2 3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.2 3B or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.2 3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.6 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper