Model comparison

Llama 3.2 3B vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 3B Meta

28.9

Rank #321 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.7 to 24.7.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 3B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Llama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index28.935.9
Released2024-09-242024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.33—
Results tracked1817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 27.6 (#319), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding10981209
BigCodeBench Instruct23.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete28.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#143), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard21.9%—
BALROG10.1%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 21.0 (#228), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10951202

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 32.4 (#214), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math11261216

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 29.7 (#235), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert10901171

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 26.2 (#281), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10191206
LMArena Chinese10171214
LMArena German10561192
LMArena Russian9491219
LMArena French—1197
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 56.0 (#275), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10891203

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#261), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11001225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 24.7 (#307), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text11101225
LMArena Creative Writing10941203
LMArena Multi-Turn11051214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing595—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.2 3B or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper