Model comparison
Llama 3.2 3B vs Mistral Large 3
Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Large 3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Large 3 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Large 3 leads 60.0 to 24.7.
- Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.75 for Mistral Large 3.
- Mistral Large 3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 118K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | $0.75 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Large 3 leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 27.6 (#319), Mistral Large 3: 34.4 (#237)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | 1448 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1230 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#143), Mistral Large 3: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 3B leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 21.0 (#228), Mistral Large 3: 15.2 (#319)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | 1429 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 50.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 7.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 23% |
Math Mistral Large 3 leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 32.4 (#214), Mistral Large 3: 38.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1126 | 1414 |
Knowledge Mistral Large 3 leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 29.7 (#235), Mistral Large 3: 36.0 (#177)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | 1421 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 14.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: —, Mistral Large 3: 38.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1221 |
Multilingual Mistral Large 3 leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 26.2 (#281), Mistral Large 3: 52.5 (#84)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | 1413 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1056 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | 1411 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1440 |
Instruction Following Mistral Large 3 leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 56.0 (#275), Mistral Large 3: 74.0 (#108)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | 1403 |
Long Context Mistral Large 3 leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#261), Mistral Large 3: 43.1 (#105)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1100 | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Large 3 leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 24.7 (#307), Mistral Large 3: 60.0 (#101)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | 1386 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | 1412 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | 1429 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 3B better than Mistral Large 3?
Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Large 3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B or Mistral Large 3?
Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 3 lists at $0.25 and $0.75.
Is Llama 3.2 3B or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?
Mistral Large 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 3 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and Mistral Large 3 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 3 has 24.