Model comparison

Llama 3.2 1B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 1B Meta

20.1

Rank #354 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 2 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 31.6 to 10.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 11.3% for Llama 3.2 1B and 40.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 1B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Llama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index20.129.7
Released2024-09-242024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window60K—
Max output54K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.027—
Output $ / M tokens$0.20—
Results tracked2219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct8.2%29.6%
LMArena Coding10701039
BigCodeBench Complete11.3%40.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard10.8%—
BALROG6.6%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10441028
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index101.99—

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math10861089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1007984
GPQA Diamond23.9%—

Multilingual Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English9731000
LMArena Chinese9591016
LMArena German10141006
LMArena Russian9411004
LMArena French—1039
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following Too close to call

Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10311023

Long Context Llama 3.2 1B leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1050996

Writing & Preference Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text10551050
LMArena Creative Writing10331024
LMArena Multi-Turn1030989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing200—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.2 1B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.8 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper