Model comparison
Llama 3.2 1B vs Nemotron 3 Super
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 1B costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Super's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Meta
NVIDIASummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 55.9 to 21.3.
- Llama 3.2 1B is cheaper at $0.027 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.08 / $0.45 for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 60K.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 40.1 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2026-03-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 60K | 262K |
| Max output | 54K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.027 | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.20 | $0.45 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 1403 |
| SciCode | — | 36% |
| WeirdML | — | 38% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 213.9 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |
Reasoning Nemotron 3 Super leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1386 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 15.4% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | — |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1380 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | 1398 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1355 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1417 |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1347 |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1362 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1369 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 1B costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Super's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 1B or Nemotron 3 Super?
Llama 3.2 1B is cheaper. It lists at $0.027 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super lists at $0.08 and $0.45.
Is Llama 3.2 1B or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 60K.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Nemotron 3 Super share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.