Model comparison

Llama 3.2 11B vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 11B Meta

31.6

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 11B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 42.6 to 23.8.
  • Llama 3.2 11B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 11B and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Llama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index31.649.8
Released2024-09-242026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked328

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1532
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%
LMArena Coding—1497

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Llama 3.2 11B: 27.0, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
BALROG16.8%—
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1490
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.18

Math Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
LMArena Expert—1485
MMLU56.5%—

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Llama 3.2 11B: 23.8, Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision9661304

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English—1479
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1494

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following—1466

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query—1483

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text—1486
LMArena Creative Writing—1444
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
LMArena Multi-Turn—1504

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 11B better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#44); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 11B and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 11B has 3 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper