Model comparison

Llama 3.2 11B vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#46); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 11B Meta

32.1

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 11B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Muse Spark leads 43.4 to 24.4.
  • Llama 3.2 11B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 11B and Muse Spark specifications
Llama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index32.150.6
Released2024-09-242026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
SciCode—51.5%
LMArena Coding—1481

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: 27.3, Muse Spark: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
BALROG16.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
CritPt—11.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1474
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
LMArena Math—1455
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1457
MMLU56.5%—

Multimodal Muse Spark leads

Llama 3.2 11B: 24.4, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
LMArena Vision9661306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English—1464
LMArena Chinese—1509
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following—1442

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMuse Spark
LMArena Text—1474
LMArena Creative Writing—1459
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 11B better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#46); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 11B and Muse Spark share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 11B has 3 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper