Model comparison

Llama 3.2 11B vs Mixtral 8x22B

Mixtral 8x22B has enough public results to be ranked (#333); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 11B Meta

32.1

Unranked Sparse

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 11B scores higher in 1 category and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Llama 3.2 11B leads 27.3 to 23.1.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 11B and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Llama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index32.127.1
Released2024-09-242024-04-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked334

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
LMArena Coding—1166
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3.2 11B leads

Llama 3.2 11B: 27.3, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
Cybench—7.5%
BALROG16.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts—1150
DTBench—55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.03
ForecastBench—56.3

Math Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
Omni-MATH—16.3%
LMArena Math—1184
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
MMLU56.5%77.8%
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
LMArena Expert—1113

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: 24.4, Mixtral 8x22B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Vision966—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English—1128
LMArena Chinese—1116
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1057
LMArena Russian—1158
LMArena Spanish—1151

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
IFEval—72.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1147

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query—1144

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 11B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text—1162
LMArena Creative Writing—1141
WildBench—71.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1130

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 11B better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Mixtral 8x22B has enough public results to be ranked (#333); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 11B and Mixtral 8x22B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 11B has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper