Model comparison
Llama 3.2 11B vs Ministral 3B
Ministral 3B has enough public results to be ranked (#338); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 11B | Ministral 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 26.2 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 11B: 27.3, Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 11B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 16.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 3.2 11B: —, Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 11B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.1 |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.2 11B: —, Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 11B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.2 11B: —, Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 11B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| MMLU | 56.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 11B: 24.4, Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 11B | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 966 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 11B better than Ministral 3B?
Ministral 3B has enough public results to be ranked (#338); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 11B and Ministral 3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 11B has 3 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.