Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #95 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 51.9 to 43.1.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.743.2
Released—2025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked1118

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding13121439

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard10%—

Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts13161428

Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Math13601426

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert—1442

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English12821405
LMArena Russian12841408
LMArena Chinese—1463
LMArena French—1452
LMArena German—1424
LMArena Japanese—1385
LMArena Korean—1394
LMArena Spanish—1428

Instruction Following Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following13081406

Long Context Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query12991420

Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Text13201420
LMArena Creative Writing13141366
LMArena Multi-Turn13171428

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper