Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 vs Qwen2-72B

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2-72B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads 52.2 to 40.8.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen2-72B specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.730.0
Released—2024-06-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1126

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
LMArena Coding13121196
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen2-72B leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149), Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard10%—
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts13161191
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.28

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
LMArena Math13601235
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —, Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
GPQA Diamond—40.8%
LMArena Expert—1171
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English12821176
LMArena Russian12841169
LMArena Chinese—1240
LMArena French—1170
LMArena German—1151
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following13081181

Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query12991192

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen2-72B
LMArena Text13201203
LMArena Creative Writing13141181
LMArena Multi-Turn13171196

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better than Qwen2-72B?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen2-72B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper