Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 vs Qwen1.5-32B

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.5

Rank #293 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads 52.2 to 34.2.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen1.5-32B specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.730.5
Released—2024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Coding13121155
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—42%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149), Qwen1.5-32B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard10%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts13161130

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Math13601155

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
GPQA Diamond—30.7%
LMArena Expert—1126
MMLU—74.4%

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Non-English12821106
LMArena Russian12841073
LMArena Chinese—1177
LMArena French—1101
LMArena German—1058
LMArena Japanese—1027
LMArena Korean—1008
LMArena Spanish—1089

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Instruction Following13081116

Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Longer Query12991146

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-32B
LMArena Text13201137
LMArena Creative Writing13141083
LMArena Multi-Turn13171140

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen1.5-32B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper