Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs Mistral

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.4

Rank #297 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 33.5 to 16.3.
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Mistral specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructMistral
ProviderNVIDIAMistral AI
Noometry Index37.029.4
Released2024-12-18—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.3 (#212), Mistral: 33.2 (#249)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructMistral
LMArena Coding12721162
BigCodeBench Instruct38.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete48.2%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 24.0 (#156), Mistral: 21.3 (#199)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructMistral
LMArena Hard Prompts12661149

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 32.9 (#182), Mistral: 20.5 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructMistral
LMArena Math12711180
Omni-MATH—7.2%

Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 33.5 (#194), Mistral: 16.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructMistral
LMArena Expert12421125
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.7 (#212), Mistral: 33.0 (#249)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructMistral
LMArena Non-English12451129
LMArena Chinese12631109
LMArena Russian12271168
LMArena French—1179
LMArena German—1155
LMArena Japanese—1012
LMArena Korean—1032
LMArena Spanish—1143

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 66.2 (#208), Mistral: 52.9 (#283)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructMistral
LMArena Instruction Following12521152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.5 (#210), Mistral: 35.0 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructMistral
LMArena Longer Query12391154

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.6 (#197), Mistral: 37.2 (#255)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructMistral
LMArena Text12831165
LMArena Creative Writing12691158
LMArena Multi-Turn12751147
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than Mistral?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or Mistral better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Mistral share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper