Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 48.4.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2024-12-18 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1272 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1271 | 1396 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1242 | 1425 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1263 | 1462 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1252 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1238 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1283 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (35.9 vs 36.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.