Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 48.4.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2024-12-18 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1272 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1271 | 1481 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1242 | 1503 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1263 | 1507 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1252 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1238 | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1283 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.