Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 35.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 48.4 to 39.7.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 35.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 34.4 (#235)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1272 | 1183 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.2% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 22.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | 1174 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 33.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1271 | 1195 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1242 | — |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | 1169 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1263 | 1176 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1193 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 61.3 (#246)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1252 | 1174 |
Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.8 (#239)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1238 | 1181 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 39.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1283 | 1193 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1154 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 35.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has 11.