Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs StarCoder 2 7B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#222); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASide by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 37.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), StarCoder 2 7B: 34.8
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 27.7% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1203 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 93.56 |
| WinoGrande | — | 57.1% |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1230 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 32.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 38.7% |
| MMLU | — | 38.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1180 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than StarCoder 2 7B?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#222); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or StarCoder 2 7B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (35.6 vs 34.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and StarCoder 2 7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.