Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs StarCoder 2 15B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#219); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASide by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 37.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.0
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 37.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1204 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 104.61 |
| WinoGrande | — | 64.3% |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1230 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 57.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 47.2% |
| MMLU | — | 64.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1179 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than StarCoder 2 15B?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#219); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (35.0 vs 36.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and StarCoder 2 15B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.