Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Phi-4 Mini
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 35.6 to 28.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1203 | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1230 | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1180 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Phi-4 Mini?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.