Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Phi-2
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#219); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MicrosoftSide by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | — |
| Released | — | 2023-12-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 45.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1204 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 59.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 107.62 |
| HellaSwag | — | 53.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 54.7% |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1230 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.9% |
| MMLU | — | 58.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 73.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 45.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1179 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Phi-2?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#219); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Phi-2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.