Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Longcat Flash Chat

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Longcat Flash Chat in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 43.4.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderNVIDIAMeituan
Noometry Index35.942.1
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding12231471

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts12031440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math12301442

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert11671454

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English11811404
LMArena Chinese11801465
LMArena Russian11871395
LMArena French—1456
LMArena German—1408
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1371
LMArena Spanish—1445

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following12011411

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query12051425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text12281427
LMArena Creative Writing12131388
LMArena Multi-Turn12271418

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Longcat Flash Chat share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper