Model comparison

Llama 3.1-8B vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-8B Meta

23.0

Rank #352 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-8B scores higher in 3 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 33.4 to 10.2.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-8B and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Llama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index23.033.0
Released2024-07-23—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked4317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 20.2 (#340), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding11951130
SciCode13.2%—
WeirdML1.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct32.8%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.5%—
HumanEval+62.8%—
MBPP+55.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-8B: 22.5 (#131), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25.8%—
BALROG15.1%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 14.9 (#321), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11751127
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA5.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.57—
PIQA81.2%—

Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 10.2 (#317), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math11791173
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.7%—
Omni-MATH13.7%—
MATH Level 522.9%—
GSM8K82.4%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#307), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert11441108
GPQA Diamond27%—
MMLU-Pro40.6%—
GPQA (HELM)24.7%—
BoolQ82.8%—
MMLU56.1%—

Multilingual Llama 3.1-8B leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 34.0 (#249), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English11481094
LMArena Chinese11511108
LMArena French11771110
LMArena German11441101
LMArena Japanese10611042
LMArena Korean1053954
LMArena Russian11581145
LMArena Spanish11691095

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-8B leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 58.9 (#258), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11591113
IFEval74.3%—

Long Context Llama 3.1-8B leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#238), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11821120

Writing & Preference Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 29.7 (#290), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text11871138
LMArena Creative Writing11541107
LMArena Multi-Turn11721088
EQ-Bench Creative Writing713—
WildBench68.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-8B better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-8B or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-8B and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-8B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper