Model comparison
Llama 3.1-8B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-8B scores higher in 0 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 42.9 to 29.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 40.6% for Llama 3.1-8B and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 23.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-07-23 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 43 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 20.2 (#340), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 13.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 1.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1195 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 62.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.1-8B: 22.5 (#131), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25.8% | — |
| BALROG | 15.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3.1-8B: 14.9 (#321), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1175 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 5.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.57 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 10.2 (#317), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 13.7% | 15.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.7% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1179 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.9% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |
Knowledge OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#307), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 40.6% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 24.7% | 31.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 27% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
| BoolQ | 82.8% | — |
| MMLU | 56.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1-8B: 34.0 (#249), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1151 | — |
| LMArena French | 1177 | — |
| LMArena German | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1053 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1169 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 58.9 (#258), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 74.3% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1159 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#238), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1182 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 29.7 (#290), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.7% | 68.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1154 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 713 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1172 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1-8B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1-8B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.6 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-8B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-8B has 43 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.