Model comparison

Llama 3.1-8B vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-8B Meta

23.0

Rank #352 Confirmed

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-8B scores higher in 3 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 10.2.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-8B and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat specifications
Llama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index23.031.8
Released2024-07-23—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked439

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 20.2 (#340), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Coding11951025
SciCode13.2%—
WeirdML1.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct32.8%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.5%—
HumanEval+62.8%—
MBPP+55.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-8B: 22.5 (#131), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25.8%—
BALROG15.1%—

Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 14.9 (#321), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts11751047
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA5.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.57—
PIQA81.2%—

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 10.2 (#317), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math11791072
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.7%—
Omni-MATH13.7%—
MATH Level 522.9%—
GSM8K82.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#307), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
GPQA Diamond27%—
MMLU-Pro40.6%—
GPQA (HELM)24.7%—
LMArena Expert1144—
BoolQ82.8%—
MMLU56.1%—

Multilingual Llama 3.1-8B leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 34.0 (#249), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English11481063
LMArena Chinese1151—
LMArena French1177—
LMArena German1144—
LMArena Japanese1061—
LMArena Korean1053—
LMArena Russian1158—
LMArena Spanish1169—

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-8B leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 58.9 (#258), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following11591060
IFEval74.3%—

Long Context Llama 3.1-8B leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#238), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query1182998

Writing & Preference Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 29.7 (#290), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text11871098
LMArena Creative Writing11541091
LMArena Multi-Turn11721058
EQ-Bench Creative Writing713—
WildBench68.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-8B better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-8B or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-8B and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-8B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper