Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Qwen3 8B

Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.4

Rank #279 Confirmed

Qwen3 8B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.3

Rank #237 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 8B in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 8B leads 33.3 to 17.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 9.7% for Llama 3.1-405B and 56.1% for Qwen3 8B.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen3 8B specifications
Llama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.433.3
Released2024-07-232025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.18
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked4211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3.1-405B: 32.7 (#257), Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
SciCode—22.6%
WeirdML21.4%—
LMArena Coding1291—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 8B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 20.9 (#131), Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—42.6%
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.4 (#293), Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
DTBench61.4%59.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index128.76136.17
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—5%
LMArena Hard Prompts1270—
LMCA—8.8%
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Qwen3 8B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 17.3 (#283), Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%56.1%
Omni-MATH24.9%—
LMArena Math1281—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge Qwen3 8B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#221), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
GPQA Diamond50.9%56.8%
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.8%
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
LMArena Expert1243—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.9 (#209), Qwen3 8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
LMArena Non-English1248—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1278—
LMArena German1252—
LMArena Japanese1208—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Russian1265—
LMArena Spanish1259—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 66.1 (#209), Qwen3 8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
IFEval81.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1259—

Long Context Too close to call

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#192), Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.1%
LMArena Longer Query1266—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 39.1 (#246), Qwen3 8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 8B
LMArena Text1284—
LMArena Creative Writing1262—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (32.7 vs 33.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen3 8B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper