Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Nova 2 Lite

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Nova 2 Lite leads 37.5 to 18.4.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Nova 2 Lite specifications
Llama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
ProviderMetaAmazon
Noometry Index30.739.7
Released2024-07-232025-12-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked4219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Coding12911385
WeirdML21.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts12691364
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
DTBench61.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Math12811359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Expert12431358
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English12481337
LMArena Chinese12421364
LMArena French12791381
LMArena German12521343
LMArena Japanese12081271
LMArena Korean11841284
LMArena Russian12651343
LMArena Spanish12601373

Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following12591335
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query12661335

Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Text12841362
LMArena Creative Writing12621291
LMArena Multi-Turn12971338
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Nova 2 Lite share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper