Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Mistral 7B

Llama 3.1-405B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

23.0

Rank #351 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1-405B leads 30.4 to 7.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 49.8% for Llama 3.1-405B and 3.7% for Mistral 7B.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Mistral 7B specifications
Llama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index30.723.0
Released2024-07-232023-09-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—8K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.25
Results tracked4237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
LMArena Coding12911082
WeirdML21.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—19.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—27.3%
HumanEval+—36%
MBPP+—42.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Mistral 7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
LMArena Hard Prompts12691067
DTBench61.4%42.5%
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%56.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75112.21
HellaSwag89.2%81%
PIQA85.9%83%
WinoGrande89.2%75.3%
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
Adversarial NLI—47.1%
ForecastBench59.9—

Math Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%0.3%
LMArena Math12811085
MATH Level 549.8%3.7%
Omni-MATH24.9%—
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
GPQA Diamond50.9%15.2%
LMArena Expert12431036
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%78.6%
MMLU84.5%62.5%
TriviaQA82.7%75.2%
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
BoolQ—87.4%
OpenBookQA—79.8%

Multilingual Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
LMArena Non-English12481012
LMArena Chinese12421009
LMArena French12791037
LMArena German1252987
LMArena Japanese1208878
LMArena Russian12651018
LMArena Spanish12601026
LMArena Korean1184—

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
LMArena Instruction Following12591060
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
LMArena Longer Query12661060

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMistral 7B
LMArena Text12841090
LMArena Creative Writing12621068
LMArena Multi-Turn12971062
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Mistral 7B?

Llama 3.1-405B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Mistral 7B better for coding?

Llama 3.1-405B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.1 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Mistral 7B share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper