Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 38.9.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
Llama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderMetaXiaomi
Noometry Index30.741.3
Released2024-07-232025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding12911443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
WeirdML21.4%—
ALE-Bench—737.95

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12691420
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
CritPt—0%
DTBench61.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math12811396
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert12431425
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English12481392
LMArena Chinese12421462
LMArena French12791429
LMArena German12521395
LMArena Japanese12081325
LMArena Korean11841358
LMArena Russian12651387
LMArena Spanish12601420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12591392
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12661409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text12841411
LMArena Creative Writing12621375
LMArena Multi-Turn12971404
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper