Model comparison
Llama 2-7B vs o1-pro
o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o1-pro leads 20.2 to 15.1.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-7B | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $600 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | — |
Reasoning o1-pro leads
Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309), o1-pro: 20.2 (#223)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | — |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge o1-pro leads
Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243), o1-pro: 29.3 (#227)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | — |
| LMArena French | 969 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-7B better than o1-pro?
o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.