Model comparison

Llama 2-7B vs Nova 2 Lite

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-7B Meta

28.6

Rank #315 Confirmed

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.0

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova 2 Lite leads 54.1 to 28.1.
  • Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 2-7B and Nova 2 Lite specifications
Llama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
ProviderMetaAmazon
Noometry Index28.639.0
Released2023-07-182025-12-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302), Nova 2 Lite: 40.1 (#131)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Coding10021386

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 2-7B: —, Nova 2 Lite: 23.9 (#114)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309), Nova 2 Lite: 26.4 (#120)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts10091364
Chess Puzzles0%—
BIG-Bench Hard39.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index98.54—
HellaSwag77.2%—
LAMBADA73.3%—
PIQA78.8%—
WinoGrande69.2%—

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231), Nova 2 Lite: 34.8 (#154)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Math10421359
GSM8K16.7%—

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243), Nova 2 Lite: 42.5 (#88)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Expert10361360
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge45.9%—
BoolQ77.9%—
MMLU45.8%—
OpenBookQA58.6%—
TriviaQA73.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 2-7B: —, Nova 2 Lite: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
ScienceQA43.1%—

Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288), Nova 2 Lite: 47.3 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English9731337
LMArena Chinese9731364
LMArena French9691381
LMArena German9781343
LMArena Russian9951343
LMArena Spanish10071372
LMArena Japanese—1273
LMArena Korean—1284

Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293), Nova 2 Lite: 70.7 (#156)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following10061335

Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#145)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query9991335

Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads

Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293), Nova 2 Lite: 54.1 (#150)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Text10531362
LMArena Creative Writing10331291
LMArena Multi-Turn10291338

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-7B better than Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-7B or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Nova 2 Lite share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper