Model comparison

Llama 2-7B vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-7B Meta

29.1

Rank #317 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.6 to 28.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 0% for Llama 2-7B and 38% for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 2-7B and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Llama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index29.154.8
Released2023-07-182026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked2937

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Coding10021514
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 2-7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
Chess Puzzles0%38%
LMArena Hard Prompts10091503
Epoch Capabilities Index99.06156.75
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
BIG-Bench Hard39.2%—
HellaSwag77.2%—
LAMBADA73.3%—
PIQA78.8%—
WinoGrande69.2%—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Math10421494
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—58%
GSM8K16.7%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248), Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert10361516
ARC (AI2) Challenge45.9%—
BoolQ77.9%—
MMLU45.8%—
OpenBookQA58.6%—
TriviaQA73.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 2-7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471
ScienceQA43.1%—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English9731481
LMArena Chinese9731529
LMArena French9701524
LMArena German9781515
LMArena Russian9951490
LMArena Spanish10071490
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following10061477

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287), Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query9991488

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text10531490
LMArena Creative Writing10331455
LMArena Multi-Turn10291482
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-7B better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-7B or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper