Model comparison

Llama 2-70B vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.4

Rank #349 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 34.3 to 8.1.

Side by side

Llama 2-70B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Llama 2-70BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index24.435.9
Released2023-07-182024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding10791209

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731202
DTBench41.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard64.9%—
CommonsenseQA 2.050%—
Epoch Capabilities Index113.79—
ForecastBench51.4—
HellaSwag85.3%—
LAMBADA78.9%—
PIQA82.8%—
WinoGrande80.2%—

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math10911216
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250%—
MATH Level 53.3%—
GSM8K69.6%—

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert10391171
GPQA Diamond26.3%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ88.6%—
MMLU69.9%—
OpenBookQA60.2%—
TriviaQA87.6%—

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10451206
LMArena Chinese9951214
LMArena French10901197
LMArena German10411192
LMArena Japanese9271128
LMArena Korean9641148
LMArena Russian10831219
LMArena Spanish11431195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10711203

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10621225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text11151225
LMArena Creative Writing10751203
LMArena Multi-Turn10881214

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-70B better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-70B or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper